Newgrange-geometry-portals
(all my blogs use a combination of
technical software: 1) high resolution image software; 2) Autodesk products
like ACAD, Autosketch and Hplanet; 3) Mathsoft like Mathcad; 4) MS Office like
MS Excel, Word, Mathematics, Quickbasic and Paint; 5) Google Earth Imaging and
measuring; and a plethora of internet searching, language translators and
historical archives. If the reader is unfamiliar with much of this software,
then just skim down thru the details and trust, for now, that they were used
professionally)
Update 4/4/2023 in blue more
magnetic portals
Update 3/25/2023 in green
magnetic portals
Update 2/10/2022 in red Kerbstone 52
Many have marveled at the alignment of Newgrange underground
network with the winter solstice usually just past mid-December each year. It
actually is far more complex than most folks even contemplate due to the details
of the location. In this discussion, the detail measurements come from the
study by Wakeman^1 around 1900 and not by Professor O’Kelly in the
1975 era.
Any non-technical person can easily satisfy their curiosity
by two simple online observations. One
of the observations is the numerous pictures from just inside the passage
looking out past a large stone and off down the valley to the River Boyne. The second is to use Google Earth and draw a
line (using the ruler option) and starting from about the center of the
entrance and drawing a line a foot or two to the east side of the large stone
just SE of the entrance and perhaps to some other more distant object along the
River Boyne area.
The GE yellow markers are positioned using only Wakeman
data. It just so happens the builder
decided to aid in understanding and cultivating curiosity by allowing a line
from the white quartz centers appear to pass thru the Wakeman measurements for
the chamber cross-cuts. Why would one choose quartz? Quartz naturally generates
electromagnetic radiation due to mechanical pressure applied to a crystal,
called piezoelectric effecct. Quartz crystals were fundamental to the
development of long-range radio equipment around WW II. Newgrange is all about
electromagnetic waves.
From the Wakeman diagram far below, one will need to make a
temporary yellow (see *1 Wakeman’s
Handbook of Irish Antiquities by John Cooke) marker 89 feet NW of the entrance
and at the azimuth you have marked in the steps above plus 180 degrees for the
opposite direction. This should be close
to the marker labeled “passage end” in the image above and fairly close to the
lawnmower dude’s idea of the top center of the mound.
The actual layout using Wakeman details is contained in the
latitude and longitude markers shown on the right side of the image. These marker gps will be used in detail to
follow further below. The radii lengths over to the white rock are equal.
Winter Solstice Sunrise
The actual winter solstice sunrise is not really visible
from the Newgrange entrance precisely.
There is a hill named Red Mountain rising just over 400 feet in
elevation in the line of view while the elevation of the entrance to Newgrange
is just under 200 feet. The ocean is not visible in that direction, where the
sun actually rises. It never has nor ever will be precisely visible at true
sunrise, but it is close in terms of degrees. The GE layout showing the ocean is
in the upper left towards Red Mountain about 8 degrees counterclockwise from
the marked passage azimuth.
The ground level GE image below shows with a little more
detail the view along the passage azimuth towards the River Boyne and beyond
out towards the ocean. One can see that the sun must be measurably above the
ocean to be seen.
The location of the sun shining into the entrance thru the roof
box is still at a very precise location that obviously stays pertinent thru all
the years modern humans have been studying it, but also far beyond that era
likely covering the range of years the earth axial tilt movement of about 2.4
degrees. While most readers know the earth’s axis is tilted and some of those
know it is cycling about 2.4 degrees every 20,500 years, probably none have
thought anybody, including modern mankind, ever contemplated making an
observational structure to record the movement. The evidence provided herein repeatedly
suggests such a concept.
Referring now back to the first image, the passage azimuth
is 1000/pi viewing southerly to northerly and the distance from the outside
stone to the end of the passage is 500/pi feet. This has been carefully
measured using GE and with the Wakeman data. Obviously, GE can only measure to
about a few inches of precision (checked on my homestead in Idaho which has
visible satellite stakes on large acreage corners). However, from the Wakeman
data there are multiple reasons to believe the layout model is quite precise
and uses multiple mathematical checks when precise model numbers are inserted.
The Wakeman diagram of the internals below has a number of easily found relationships that suggest there is a design plan to the layout of the structure.
The model image below was also used in the first blog. It
shows how the four unknowns from Wakeman fit very precisely into a mathematical
model and also highlight other relationships not likely familiar to most
readers. The input shows the passage lengths in C1, C2 and C3 and the cross-cut
(mining lingo) at V1, V2 and V3. The use of the name Phi2 was because Mathcad
already uses phi in its standard operations.
The eye-catching relationship using the conjugate ratio of
the overall length and the width is equal to phi. This relationship demonstrates
a sophisticated knowledge of math. The scientific relationships demonstrate
knowledge of astronomy. The re-substitution highlights demonstrate that these,
and probably many others, are real.
.jpg)
The outputs are only a tiny fraction of an inch different from
the original measures by Wakeman used to suggest these model numbers which could
not be measured that precisely. However, the model correctly calculates all the
four relationships exactly.
The green underlined conjugate assumption is widely used in
Newgrange in a way suggesting somebody knew a lot about earth-based astronomy.
This number derives from the following:
[(1.71875 x
12) x (1000) / 12^2 ]^(1/2) /8 =1.49597856
Where 1.71875 is the Egyptian Royal Cubit in feet and
149,597,870.7 is the current committee determined Astronomical Unit. It was originally supposed to be the average
distance from earth to sun which has to vary annually due to the dumbbell shape
of the earth and moon combination as well as wobble in the sun due to large
planets. We currently find exoplanets in other star systems by examining the
star wobble.
The blue assumption uses the universal gravitation constant
of G= .01720209895 often referred to as the Newton’s Constant or Cavendish’s
constant. The equation uses the form of X^(1/Y) similar to the Jakob
Steiner equation X^(1/X). In
most cases the original Wakeman data suggests these numbers to about 5 digits
of precision. The fact that the model
works so precisely indicates further undiscovered relationships.
In the Wikipedia article “Gaussian gravitational constant”
there is an explanation detailing the relationship between that constant and
the astronomical unit. It does not appear to be a “random accident” that these
two would be developed in the same model.
There are too many examples to list where the natural logarithm plays a role in developing scientific relationships.
We will see in the Kerb Stone 52 analysis another link
between prime 149 (137 +12) and the constant inverse fine structure constant 137.03599908. Can these be hints of how the universe is put
together without the lack of precision in measurements?
If the reader wants to expand a mathematical knowledge base,
the Wikipedia articles on “exponentiation” and “mathematical constants” will
take you far beyond what you might think. Whatever was the intelligence behind
large constructions like Newgrange knew that initial discoveries of the
communications would be by relatively dumb people like myself. Highly
specialized mathematicians are thinking too far out of the box.
From the image above containing all the latitudes and
longitudes of the Google Earth markers on the right margin, the Excel image
below shows how the entire Newgrange layout is related to the ratio of the
latitude to longitude because of its particular location on earth. Surely no one
is suggesting reindeer ropers knew the latitude and longitude that precisely. 😊 (see Appendix Mathematical
Modeling 101)
The dimensionless ratio of latitude to absolute longitude
(8.29xxx) is divided by 4 and taken to the ¼ root and multiplied by 100/8 to
get a 14.99xxx type number before taking to the 1/5 root to get a number
similar to 1.71875. In the next step that number is multiplied by 12000/144 and
then taken to the ½ root and divided by 8 and the decimal shift eight places
for the astronomical unit type number. The actual Excel formulae are below.
((D11/E1 x 1/4)^(1/4)/8*100)^(1/5)
(F11*12000/144)^(1/2)/8*100000000
There may be places in the chamber that exactly fit the
current Astronomical Unit. If the distance from earth to the sun was some
number like 98,765,432.12345 miles, the church folks would have won out over
science centuries ago. In fact, if it is “any mathematically related number” it
is a partial indication of some type of creation versus a random event as seems
important to mainstream science for no apparent reason other than to shut the
church folks up. Creation does not have to be at the “hands of God”.
The original blog covers this area in detail and is not
repeated here.
The image below on the west side of the passage a little
more than half way from the roof box to the chamber and is likely located at
the average of the six points which leads to the calculation of Comet 1680 half
cycle of 20718-year earth axis cycle of an average of 18 double cycles of 1151
years. This may allow a more precise calculation of Comet 1680 cycle of
1151.0086 years. It uses the
mathematical relationship of X^(1/Y) where X is the latitude and Y
is the absolute longitude.
The details for the calculation of the latitude &
longitude averages are in the spreadsheet image below. One can easily see that
the Jakob Steiner equation produces a very precise value for the Comet 1680
double cycle of 1151.0086. That number
can now be substituted into other blogs where the Astronomical Almanac numbers
are analyzed.
The image above appears, to me, to show three solar systems
at huge distances apart but brought together by a portal shown as a diamond
shape between the two larger spirals. A similar analysis of the diamond shapes
on Kerb Stone 52 follows further below.
The image below shows how the latitude-longitude ratio
converts the layout to an astronomical chart using changes in the earth-sun
distance. It demonstrates the use of 1.71875 (Egyptian Royal Cubit) as a
center-point for relating points on the ground to the distance. What might the
purpose be for such an activity?
The important averages are highlighted in red numerals and
the equation using the Steiner equation highlights the Steiner contribution in
red numerals. This is all part of a mathematical procedure for relating
scientific formulae. The primary procedure uses the division by 144 and the
square root of 2.06xxxx numbers to other numbers like 1.1999xxx by dividing by
8 and then shifting the decimal with multiplication by 100.
For example, if we know the hydrogen hyperfine frequency
with much greater precision than we can measure, such as the square root of
(89669 x 225 x 10^xx) we can get 1.42040575188923 or any precision we want.
From that number we solve for the X in the Steiner equation X^(1/X)
to get 2.061755296xxxx to as much precision as we want. There actually are two
solutions, but the lower one is used here.
The square root of 2.061755xxxx times 144 gives the
electron-muon magnetic moment ratio 206.7669167xxx which can give us hints
about other types of earth-sun relationships which may not be fully discovered
at this time. It all comes together as some type of mathematical procedure for
discovering new relationships.
Another example of a procedure uses the two dimensionless
ratios of muon-electron (206.768283) and neutron-electron [1838.683368xxx from
1/ln(1.3125^2) ].
((2.06768283
/ 1.838683368 * 2000)^(1/10) /40 )^(1/2)*40 = 8.291447288
This number then goes backward to become a latitude-longitude
ratio to be located on Google Earth at Newgrange. It turns out that it is so
precise, it can be found on the Kerb Stone 52 within inches of a mark thereon.
(it helps to have written a QuickBasic program to find it faster 😉 ) However, it can be found by
trial and error.
How
about the Tibetans and other folks who say the universe is on a
311,040,000,000,000 cycle and 7 cycles must occur before the universe goes to sleep?
What do you suppose the natural logarithm of that number is???
1/(ln (311,040*10^(9) * 7))^(1/3)
= 0.304793711
Once
upon a time not too long ago in my high school Handbook of Chemistry and
Physics it showed the conversion for metric to British system lengths at
0.30479xxx and then later “an all-knowing committee” decided to round it off to
0.3048. Perhaps after reading this they will want to change their mind again.
Our double system of units and their conversions are another example of
mathematical procedures.
(see
appendix on modeling 101)
Revision
Before Publication
After completing most of what follows the “Secondary Purpose of Newgrange” it became obvious there was a lot more to learn from the Wakeman Data Model and so this section is inserted and hopefully nothing that has not been already defined above at this point will be used in this section. The image below in cyan columns F and H is the Epoch J2000 data for our solar system, starting at the top with mercury and procedding out thru asteroid Ceres and on to Neptune and Pluto. The data used here is in columns G and I that have converted earth to exactly 1.000000000.
More
than a decade ago these types of relations were found but no over-all
relationship tying them together was found.
It wasn’t until deciphering the Newgrange Wakeman Data Model that the
support was found for some “overall mathematical relationship”. What should we
think about Mars dimensionless distance data being so precisely close to
pi^(1/e)=1.52367 marked in yellow in column G? This is six digits, meaning a 1
in 999,999 of being an accident. What about Venus period being so precisely the
reciprocal of 2^(128/12) = 0.6151957
marked green in column I? We know 2^(1/12) is the foundation of all
our musical tuning for the last century or so.
We have learned from my other blogs the basic building block of mass
1.66053906 x 1 E -24 taken to the 1/128 or 1/ 2^7 gets us close to
Ancient Egyptian King Chamber dimensions or “a-like x 1.2 = 2.06xxxx.
One
should pay particular attention to column E which is the natural log ratio of
time over distance which are all 1.49xxxx numbers and when multiplied by 10 and
taken to the fifth root become “a-like” numbers. The planets out to the
asteroid Ceres are on one equation and from there out on another equation.
Only
a few examples are highlighted in the image above in order to keep the data
jungle to a minimum. But it is what happened with the Wakeman Data Model that
caused a new interest in planetary data and scientific data connection with
phi.
As
has been done on my numerous blog models, the 8 pieces of data are entered in a
Excel spreadsheet in a vertical array and then a transposed horizontal array
across the top to create all possible dimensionless ratios from the data. There
are 64 ratios even though half of them (32) are the reciprocal of another one.
In
the far-right bottom of the chart highlighted in red numerals is the
relationship of overall length divided by width equal to phi cubed. This means
the reciprocal also in red is the square root of 5 minus 2.
In
the column D, first ratio marked in blue, the mathematical procedure to be
discussed is used to develop an “A-like” ratio of 1.7183083xxx. The ratio is 2.9994000
where 29994 factors into 2 x 3 x 4999. Multiplying by 5 gives a 14.997 which
can be taken to the fifth root to get an “A-like” number 1.718703. [actual
formula is (((D571*5)^(1/5)*1.2)^(1/4)/4*50)^(1/5).
Multiplying by 1.2 and taken to the fourth root yields a 1.19838xxx number and
that type divided by 4 and multiplied by 50 and then again taken to the fifth
root gives another “a-like” number 1.718308xxx given above. The planet Uranus
gives this same number from the ratio x 10 taken to the fifth root. This is an
example of the “mathematical procedure” we are trying to understand and
Newgrange is going to help us.
Just below the 1.718308 number in blue is the Jupiter
distance of 5.2025969xxx which develops from the procedure (LN(D580)*50)^(1/2)
which fits the Epoch J2000 data quite precisely to 7 digits in column G in the
image earlier.
Each reader can spend as much time as wanted to check out
the other examples shown. One may want to copy this image and blow it up to
better read it. The color coding represents data and calculation in the
respective column and also the letter colors and sometimes italic script. The
spreadsheet will be made available to those wanting to delve into the
mathematics in more detail.
The image below gets at the heart of the mathematical
procedure. In the top solution one can see there is a maximum and minimum
developed for an “a-like” number input in red and answer in green. The green is
then substituted into the red and a new green calculated. When continued, the
final result is 1.7182876069946xxxx to whatever precision desired. (the 19th
root is hard to distinguish from 10).
The second and third steps are what is necessary to
calculate the conjugate ratio to find the source of it all. One can see the
following.
Conjugate
ratio of phi and 1.602176634
(1.618033989+1.602176634)/(1.618033989
– 1.602176634) = 203.0736xxx
A ten key calculator just won’t cut it. Here Microsoft
Mathematics is used at a higher precision using 1.6180339887499 for phi and it
develops 1.6021766344898 which is far beyond anything that can be measured. And
that may be the whole purpose of this type of mathematical system.
Measurements have taken our civilization a long way forward,
but it seems to be running out of gas at the precision we are now operating.
One reason likely is patterned after the example of Newton’s calculations of
gravity without the benefit of relativity developed by Einstein only a few
hundred years later. What else don’t we
know? Is there a tempic field? Does
magnetism have a secondary force that organizes things into hexagon
patterns? It sure looks like it.
If we think of a portal for traveling huge distances
instantly, we don’t really have to worry about hitting something along the way
because we are not really travelling. We
simply disappear where we are and re-assemble at some very distant location. However….it might be best if we didn’t
materialize inside or too close to a star. Perhaps a safer materialization
might be best outside of a solar system.
Precision might be extremely important.
Now back to the original development of Newgrange.
The Secondary Purpose of Newgrange
As experienced and competent as Wakeman was, it is hard to
imagine that he would show the passage nice and straight in the top view when
after the O’Kelly dig it looks like a series of changes were made during
reconstruction. O’Kelly construction photos show a cable crane moving blocks
around apparently before track hoes with thumbs were widely available at a
reasonable cost in Ireland. This cable equipment would not lend itself to
precise placement of large stones even if they knew where the stones should be.
It looks like they started at the entrance laying the stones, then a winter
solstice appeared and they decided the direction wasn’t right and bent to the
left. Then perhaps another winter solstice came along and they realized they
went too far and decided to set the last direction to the chamber. Given the length of time involved, several
winter solstices events may have brought them back on track now and then. There
appears to be several errors in the O’Kelly book which were likely made by
drafting and image processing people. He
was approaching 80 years of age when the final efforts were being analyzed.
The emphasis on the impact (no pun intended) of Comet 1680
is covered in the original blog. Here the
effort is first expanded to cover the effect on the earth axial tilt, a much
larger topic and far more complex, but still related to the comet. The Wakeman
diagram is used exclusively. Fortunately too, is that this analysis is
primarily in the chamber area and that may not have been disturbed as much as
other areas by the O’Kelly dig since the lower large stones were exposed by the
chamber overhead and were maybe not moved at all.
Using special software that calculates the winter and summer
solstice angles for any latitude, cyan and blue dashed lines were constructed
off the centerline of the passage using those solstice angles. At first these were put on the right side of
the chamber but the ends didn’t connect with any marks. They were then grouped
in ACAD and moved northerly to the NE side where they are now. It was noted then
that they all grazed together on the NW stone of the west entrance when moved up
against the SW corner of the east entrance.
Then it was noted that they might mathematically, or virtually, reflect
off to the spirals on the east side of the end of the passage.
It is all marked blue and cyan in the image below. The top of the image is blown up on the right
to show the interaction with the lower left spiral of the East chamber spirals.
(click and copy the image and enlarge it in your photo software)
One can see that the overall half cycle of 20,700 years fits
inside the spiral range and the two blue dashed lines representing 2256 AD when
Comet 1680 returns and minus 2347 BC when Comet 1680 first came by on the earth
side of the sun during the summer solstice after Newgrange was just built.
While very imprecise, this indicates that the spirals may in fact represent a
relationship with the 1151-year double cycle of Comet 1680 as covered in other
blogs. The overall 20,700-year half cycle would likely be covered with 17 to 19
double cycles of 1151 years as shown in the Berger data covered in other blogs.
The image below is the detail of the spiral’s interaction
with a horizontal line thru the centers of the double spiral in the east
chamber. If one were to place a laser on the east cavern spiral marked stone
and direct it past the edge of the entrance stone, it would hit on the NW
corner stone on the west entrance. A second laser placed at that point and
directed appropriately for a reflection off that curved stone, it would hit on
the spirals on the southerly side of the east entrance. These spirals are
copied from a photo and placed into ACAD.
The blue marks are pretty near a 1151 year cycle.
The image below is the spirals on the SE side of the passage
at the beginning of the east chamber. A similar process was used to bounce
lines off curved surfaces using a circle of curvature and equal reflected
angles. One can see in the magenta
circles that there are several alternatives that might serve as an indication
of earth axial tilt reversal in the lower right double spiral.
One can see that the spirals do not have to be all that
precise in order to achieve the communication, albeit from other analysis,
there are some very precise indicators. The angles in cyan are from another
mathematical model.
Chamber Geometry
If the chamber has some type of overall geometry, perhaps
there is a way to draw attention to the reason for the overall layout. There
are three key regions to consider. One is the so-called triple spiral (meaning
three spirals, not lines) at the end of the east cross chamber; the second is
the triple spiral at the transition from passage to east cross chamber; the
third is the rounded “reflective stone” at the NE corner entrance to the west
cross chamber.
The left portion below is the initial drawing. The center of
the horizontal connecting line is the starting point. The similar center of the
horizontal line across the right point on the spirals at the passage to east
chamber transition. The third point uses
a three-point circle option to provide the curvature for the west chamber
bottom point. In spite of appearing quite general, these options provide a
fairly specific drawing. At the time of drawing there was no apparent reason
why anything should come of it.
In the spreadsheet below, one can see some really unexpected
results appeared. The dimensionless ratio of the longest side to the shortest
and then doubled produced six digits of the mass of the deuteron and was one of
the two primary equations for the model.
The second equation is the 20625.05 yellow highlight which resulted from
the dimensionless conjugate ratio of all three measurements. The primary
results of this endeavor were the multiple production of 20718 type numbers
which is the 1151 double cycle for Comet 1680 times 18, the quite close
resemblance of the overall earth axis tilt of 20718 x 2 = 41,436 years. From
the Berger data, the cycle varies but tends to differ by 1151-year increments,
say 17 or 19 intervals instead of always 18. It also appears from the Berger
data that the complete reversal may take 3 consecutive cycles and then it maintains
to the next reversal at a steady rate.
From the details of each stone in the Wakeman image, it is
clear they spent a lot time measuring. It is hoped this data will be enough for
future researchers to pick up the reins and move ahead. Comet 1680 will
eventually be found to be Planet X or 10 as the JPL bunch already suspect. But a dark star at those distances will be
hard to find by telescope. Hopefully the
New Horizons space probe will pick it up in the next decade before its life is
ended.
If this was the intent of the Newgrange leadership design,
it would definitely justify the effort that went into the construction, albeit
primarily benefitting folks thousands of years from now. But that would give earth mankind a chance to
quit building near ocean shores and head for the hills with the majority of the
populations. It would also give us time to build a communication system like
the Sumerian tablets but with more illustrations like comic books. Perhaps thin
metal sheets made of non-corrosive material such titanium would be better than
gold which would be attractive to “returned to stone age” thieves.
Obviously, this analysis needs to be expanded exponentially
to gain the kind of detail necessary to provide confidence in pursuit of this
type of analysis. If this is not the
intent, it certainly should motivate us to examine things a little more
confidently. Newgrange wreaks of intelligent design by at least one person at
the time of its creation. If one believes God created the universe, why in the
world would you insist that God only put people here on “eerie earth” where
every 1151 years there is potential for a problem and every 20,700 years
potential for a big problem? No wonder aliens leave us alone and don’t want to
settle here. 😊
Kerb Stone Decorations or Portals?
If the above description provides curiosity to the careful
reader, perhaps the markings on some stones should be analyzed in greater
detail to see if they are trying to tell us a more general story. It appears
that Newgrange, Stonehenge, Teotihuacan, Chaco Canyon and others all have a
story to tell using the mathematical relationships that describe our universe
using the fundamental number A=1.718281828459 where A equals natural log base
E=2.718281828459 minus one. This number is developed from a factorial series
summation and is generally covered in older calculus books, particularly back
when logarithms were far more important and the widespread use of slide rules.
There are spirals and diamond shaped marks all over the site
that have been attributed to “decorations”.
This is far from reality on Kerb Stone 52. One image from the Kerb Stone
52 on the northerly side is analyzed in this section in great detail in
Autodesk products along with MS Excel. Just the analytical image is shown as
the Kerb Stone 52 images are readily available on the internet. (copy and
enlarge this image to read the details)
Instead of trying to identify the corners, four lines were
drawn along the straightest section of each side. These lines were then electronically extended
until they intersected with each other. The ACAD data from that initial drawing
was copied and pasted into Excel where all possible dimensionless ratios were
easily visible. This technique is routinely used in other blogs and is not
repeated here.
When the dimensionless ratios can easily be converted to
some mathematical constant particularly using the same procedure, an equation
can be written to potentially develop a very precise model with far more detail
than could ever be measured. If one has 4 unknowns and four equations, there is
potential for a solution.
The angles were defined by using diagonals which then
provided 8 angles around the four corners and two more angles where the
diagonals intersect. This technique provided 5 simple geometric identities. Only
two scientific equations were used and were built around the number 2.061755296xxxx. This number used in the equation X^(1/X)
= 1.42040575188923 where this latter number is very similar to the hydrogen
hyperfine frequency normally given as 1420.40575177xxx but is independently
derived in a very simple equation using the prime number 89669 x 2.25 x 1 E 11
square root covered in other blogs.
Later we will show that the electron-muon magnetic moment
dimensionless ratio can easily develop the same number as shown below:
`206.7669883 / 144 and then squared = 2.061756
The original ACAD data gives the number as 2.0617xxx by two
different equations. The entire drawing can be reproduced just from this data,
but without knowing at least one side, the ranges of sizes cannot be
determined. One could take the Kerb 52 pictures and get a pretty good idea of
the value of the diamond on the rock, but that would not be the precision
required to make other checks. Some type of model needed to be developed using
the Excel dimensionless ratios of the sides.
One of the key numbers used in an equation followed a
similar example using the Jakob Steiner X^(1/X) equation to get
1.370359991 using X= 1.718507325. One
can see that the original dimensionless ratio of sides developed the number
1.718506, still precise to six digits.
The next key number was used in the second equation and is
developed from [((120/A^(2))^2 /2]^(1/9) = 2.1091433636982. You can see the original data developed this
number 2.109104xxx to five digits. For the non-technical folks, these
are the digits of the Planck Constant divided by pi.
The third equation used a simple dimensionless ratio of sides to get 1.71828257xxx and of course it was replaced with A=1.718281828459.
Near the bottom of the image one can see when the model
solutions are checked for the produced results although are further away than
is normally found in successful models.
But sometimes these exercises lead to a discovery linking scientific
numbers to prime numbers. The number 149
is a prime number.
4000/(ln((149/10)^(1/5))*10)^(2)
=137.0360022 which has an “A” solution of 1.718507435
In the image below, one can see the combined model output is
shown on the far right in dashed black (smaller to fit in one image) alongside
the original drawing atop the Kerb stone 52 image. On the left the two are enlarged and combined. The thin and dashed black lines allow the
colored original to show thru and show how just a four-digit similarity makes
them almost identical in appearance.
There is no sign that these carvings were done with lasers
or anything we might use today or by what we might think is advanced technology.
The suspicion here is that there was some type of intelligent leader guiding
local people to make the most of the carvings.
Likely there are many copycat images all over the place that probably
are decorations. Kerb Stone 52 appears to have special ranking in its isolated
location where it is perpendicular to the magnetic flow of materials from the
sun when the earth is tipped toward the sun as it is in the summer solstice.
Potential Image of Comet Capture
The image below strongly suggests something like a Comet1680
capture. In the bottom right in green is what could be a passing star dragging
the comet along when our sun pulls it away toward the solar system. In the second image below, a configuration
that might bend the captured comet as depicted in the left half of the
image. As the comet comes to a stop say
out towards the Oort Cloud, it is then gradually pulled back directly towards
the sun until it sees the right half image perhaps two hundred years later that
shows it bending towards say Saturn and then Jupiter and avoiding a collision
with the sun….barely.
The images below are
from Hplanet software available on the internet for free. The two patterns were
easily found using dates near the Comet 1680 approach and departure. Since
these solar system patterns repeat on a 1151 year cycle, they would have many opportunities
over millions of years.
In the above analysis, keep in mind the person carving the
stone is trying to tell a story and not necessarily has the stone surface area
available to make everything to scale.
He just has enough to say, “look here stupid”….unless of course you are
Irish. 😊
Is
it possible that things will get right and Comet 1680 will crash into the
sun…making things a bit messy…or might it just as well get slung out into space
to make things miserable for somebody else?
But keep in mind it is what is keeping earth ticking back and forth on
its axis and if that quits, earth could roll over like Uranus….probably making a
bad day for some folks. The good news might be that earth is so unpredictable
that no advanced civilization wants to settle here and take our best-looking
women. 😊
Breaking
the above image into two aspects, the image below from Hplanet shows how it
might have been in more scientific terms.
Combining the Diamond Shape Models
The results from the side model was made part of the input
to the combined model along with the results of the angle model as shown in the
image below.
The symbolic solution can then be checked by placing the
values into the defining equations and checking to make sure the fit is exact
in all equations. Six are shown below
but all have been checked.
Kerb Stone 52 Details
The general image below shows just some of the additional geometric
representations of interest on the often-photographed KS 52 on the northerly
side of the mound opposite the entrance passage. Many of these patterns have
not yet been analyzed.
The full image of Kerb Stone 52 was analyzed in ACAD and a
spreadsheet of dimensionless ratios was put together as shown in the images
below. Just as if it was planned, the ratio of leg 6.0548521/4.6723596 provided
a number that could be turned into a 1.718764463 number which in turn converts
to a latitude/longitude ratio and is shown with a Google Earth yellow marker in
the bottom right of the second GE image below.
The overall sum of all 16 ratios, including the 1’s is
16.48587 quite near the square root of E x 10 and highlighted in yellow.
However, when the azimuth from that pad to KS 52 is changed from degrees to a dimensionless
ratio dividing by 360, it easily converts exactly to the 16.48587, likely an enhanced
suggested-precision by highs and lows canceling out in the sixteen ratios.
There will be a few who, knowing the author is an engineer
and programmer, think this type of thing could be created. Please trust me,
even knowing what the models are showing, it still is too complicated to
program and make so many of the aspects nest together.
The red line image was copied and pasted into another ACAD
drawing that had the Google Earth Image below.
Noting that the curvature of the pad marked in yellow
matched pretty well with the hole pattern in red, that had been mirrored and
rotated, the two images were stretched to fit the same scale as the GE image and
they show a remarkable fit in 4 out of the 5 locations. The middle location
appears to hit about the mid-point between the two corners of two pads. Perhaps
there is some currently unknown reason for that.
The hole pattern can be stretched a little more and it also
fits on the outer corners. This created an interest in what would happen if one
could connect the centers. In Google Earth, the path function allows one to
determine the centers by drawing the diagonals first and then proceeding to the
center of the large rectangle on the bottom right…noting the accumulated
distance and subtract that from the final length at the center of the top
rectangle. This distance is quite precisely the square root of 50,000 = 223.61
feet. A value that would convey “design intent” quite effectively.
There is absolutely nothing simple about the design of these
rectangles. If they have been modified in modern times, somebody from the
original construction left them superb clues. Somebody must have guessed that
this type of methodology in this blog would be used and the overall “center
finding event” produced a total of 1215.67 / 2 =607.84 feet from the top NE
corner to the top NE corner on the bottom rectangle. (1215.67 being the average
of the most abundant hydrogen wavelengths)
In the image below, one can see the design methodology for
the size and layout of each rectangle. The white lines are from the path
function and total to 1408.05 feet. The yellow line from the “line function”
gives the length and azimuth of one of the radii. The azimuth of 5261 /100 is a prime number.
The length is a simple function of the hydrogen hyperfine frequency of 2000 /
1.42040575 = 1408.048367.
One should note that the calculated latitude longitude ratio
precisely locates the yellow marker about center of the top of the largest pad
in the bottom right of the GE image. This cannot be an accident. The whole
affair fits together entirely too well.
The images from the Mathcad model for the pads are provided
below. They are a bit technical for most
people, so if the reader is interested just copy the image and blow them up to
easily see the detail. This demonstrates a design that is a bit far from the
imagination of some “decorative dude”. 😊
Newgrange Pad Model page 1 (copy and enlarge for details)
Newgrange Pad Model page 2
Probably people are saying, “Why don’t they just come out
and tell us they are advanced?” One must
consider they had no idea what language; how developed technically; whether
rock rustlers would tear them apart like the Great Pyramid; all sorts of
unknowns. So they just had to do what
they thought would be most likely to be discovered…and…decoded. And people like
savants have been around for millennia and they are not known to provide simple
explanations. And perhaps they meant the image for earthlings, and not for some
alien conquerors that take us over temporarily.
The Kerb Stone 52 marks appear to be the table of contents
for Newgrange. Below are all sorts of
connections that shouldn’t happen with some reindeer roper making poo poo marks
for decorative purposes. There is a new hot topic called “magnetic portals”
which has the science fiction fanatics all in a twit. But this is a real topic and is really
happening at NASA.
The image below shows some examples of pictures and images
from reports that come a lot closer to matching the stone works than anything
else does. If you go to the website of the University of Iowa at www.space.physics.uiowa/scudder
you will find in the numerous reports images like the two right side below in
white. (copy and enlarge this image)
The “Hidden Portals” image from NASA is a normal spiral we
typically draw, but is a double spiral.
The spirals on Kerb Stone 52 are mathematically different but they are
usually double spirals as discussed earlier. Notice how the center has an
almost precise similarity to the centers of the stone spirals.
The bottom left insert shows how the simple dimensionless
ratio of two important angles can lead to a connection with the
latitude/longitude ratio of the end of the passage. Two other portions of this
stone image have been proven to relate mathematically to other areas and this
is just one more but perhaps more understandable to the non-technical folks.
Ovals Model
In the image above, there appeared to be some echo in the U. of Iowa data but there was no consistent circles or lines to compare dimensionless ratios. However, in ACAD products one can use the Inquiry function for areas and perimeters and create various dimensionless ratios using perimeter squared divided by area; ratio of areas or perimeters; and sometimes conjugate dimensionless ratios of those measurements. The image below shows in the upper right two outer ovals that were measured. Surely a non-expert wouldn’t have this type of technology using only ancient thoughts.
The outer portion of the ovals showed the best results for
the issue of magnetic portals even though there are many such results in other
areas. The technique is to blow up the image as large as possible and still fit
on the screen and then trace around the perimeter in small steps. Usually it is
best to repeat the process several times and take the average. In the first try
or two the upper ledge of the chiseled channel was used. After the model in the image below, the
bottom of the same edge was used to confirm the model represented something
repeatable on the image.
Everything that has been measured in this manner shows that
there is a serious likelihood that the image is trying to convey something
meaningful, and is not purely some type of decoration. The hole arrangement
would be most difficult to achieve with modern equipment such as a computer-controlled
drilling apparatus. This type of stone may not stand firm for anything powerful
and finding and delivering to the site redo stones would not be a good option
if a large chunk fell out.
One can see in the assignment section that the speed of
light constant showed up twice; the electron-muon magnetic moment ratio once;
and the square of phi once. The results from the MinErr Function shows in the
resubstituting at the bottom that the results were very precise. The 20.6766992399621 is quite close to the
range in the most recent Codata and may be even closer in the coming years.
The images below from NASA further demonstrate a reason for the type of marks on Kerb Stone 52.
The image of KS 52 is extremely complex and will not be
fully understood until a 3 D scanner is used to precisely locate everything. The
image below can easily become too cluttered to decipher. But at the top in
dashed green is a circle defined by three centers marked with three thin solid
lines. The one can see that this circle
very nearly is centered on the right yellow circle (marked with green cross) and
passes really near the center of the left yellow circle (holes). The centers of
the defining circles are not previously marked or called attention to. Only after the curved triangular shapes are
marked with three-point arcs can the three end-points be used to define a
three-point circle with a precise center. This seems to indicate some important
message, but one that the designer wanted camouflaged to everyone except when
done in the manner presented here. The reader needs to think about this. It is not complicated mathematically, but far
too precise for casual decorations.
Similarly, a larger dark cyan dashed circle is defined by the light cyan circle centers at 2, 12 and 9 o’clock locations similarly defined with three-point arcs and resulting three-point circles. That large dark cyan dashed circle then has 4 other events marked with short red lines. Another smaller dark cyan dashed circle defined by three yellow circle centers (one common at 9 o’clock) then passes thru the center of a dark red circle between ovals.
This is by far not an easy construction to satisfy
overlapping complex geometric connections. Even after viewing this
demonstration, few people could construct this image in ACAD or anywhere else.
The image below attempts to show additional examples of how
even a distant green circle center can have multiple contacts in different
forms. The radius is defined by the yellow dashed hole on the bottom just right
of center. Other tangents are marked with a thin line green diamond. The yellow dashed circle has its center at
the multiple circles with tangents at the top two holes and the bottom left
hole.
The red dashed circle has six contacts and is defined by the
top three center red markers. Its center is in the yellow circles but not at
any significant location. Note that it passes exactly thru the bottom left hole
with circular rings along with the yellow dashed circle. It also passes thru
the three-type intersect at center bottom.
What, if any, are of significance depends on the overall
objective of the communication. It could be various aspects of magnetic portals
or perhaps something totally different. But they are definitely not random
artistic drawings.
In the image below, when the solid yellow circle is
constructed from the three centers marked with a yellow marker arrow, the
center occurs right at the dark cyan also marked with a yellow arrow. This is
plenty to demonstrate design intent, but there is a whole second layer of information
in the angles between the radii drawn to the three circles. The dimensionless
ratio of 85.6210412 to 59.7294238 easily converts using similar procedures in
converting the latitude to longitude ratio to a 1.7187xxx type number to the
electron-muon magnetic moment ratio of 206.7669883 (currently…has been
lower and will likely go higher). And still further, this sequence of
discoveries led to finding that dividing the electron-muon magnetic moment by
144 and then squaring it, led to finding the number 2.061755296 which in
turn uses the Jakob Steiner equation of X^(1/X) and led to finding
1.4204057188923, the hydrogen hyperfine frequency using prime number 89669 x
2.25*1 E 11 taken to the square root.
In reverse, the hydrogen number develops the magnetic moment
ratio as 206.7669167 which is getting pretty close to the margin of error in
measuring. A prime number equal has not yet been found but there likely is one.
Updated 3/22/2023
The only thing that makes any sense
to me is that this drawing on K52 is depicting something that is
three-dimensional (3D) on a (2D) surface. A 3D image would be a clutter of
overlapping lines very difficult to carve and maybe totally illegible to any
future educated observer. We would now days, do it on a computer screen, create
loops with different colors and maybe line thickness variations.
In the image below two dashed green lines were carefully marked on
the right side of Kerbstone 52 and the ACAD lengths shown in white. These
measurements were defined in Mathcad in the top left in bold black letters
assigned to variables “longhole” and “shorthole”. Just below that are the two
key relationships. On the center just left of the stone picture, Newgrange
Procedure is used to define the magnetic flux quantum (the original pass used
the recent Codata given below). In the second equation on the left, the
original pass used the Steiner value that describes the hydrogen hyperfine
(2.061755296^(1/2.061755296) = 1.42040575188923. While the dimensionless results
gave reasonable targets for the two equations, the values no longer were in the
same world with the original measurements.
In any number tried for the magnetic flux quantum, the number
2061766xxx kept coming up for the 2.0617xxx number equation. That repeating number
was then entered into the Newgrange Procedure in the center highlighted in cyan
and solved in MS Mathematics at the bottom of the image to unlimited precision.
That number was then entered in the top left equation and the magnetic flux
quantum number beyond 8 digits was gradually altered to make the top left
equation produce that result in the bottom left result check, underlined in
red. Then the magnetic flux quantum equation was checked in the ratio of the
conjugate ratio and the plain dimensionless ratio of lengths. This is shown in
the result underlined in green to be very near equal and could have been made
equal if it had been pursued further.
There is a lot to be frustrated with MS Mathematics, but in this
case, it really paid big dividends. While Mathcad would give the precise data
fit, it would not give the intermediate solution which is the 1/133 root of
6.2208 x 10^(41) and that number is just 2 x 10^(27) of
the Hindu and some other folks number of 311,040,000,000,000 which has been
around for a very long time. In another part of this blog, we see the natural
log of that number times 7 yields the metric to British conversion of length.
We should also note that the number developed that relates the electrostatic
charge number to phi uses the 1/19th root and this equation uses
1/133th which is 1/19 x 1/7. One might think that perhaps the intelligence
behind Newgrange moved to high ground in Tibet. 😊
Most readers will not have a clue as to what the magnetic flux
quantum is or why it has been decreed to be 206.7833848 without the trailing
zeros. Maybe some readers will know that the magnetic field emanating from a
magnetic device can be easily measured and integrated over the surface. The
magnetic flux quantum apparently falls out from research on superconducting
devices and is very specialized.
For the benefit of the reader who maybe is a little more interested
in the artwork consideration, the image below from Pinterest website shows what
a real artist thinks is “artistic”. This drawn on paper (much easier than
carving stone) and in the upper left still shows how difficult it is to draw
irregular spirals. There are very noticeable abrupt changes in arc three-point
centers.
There is a total lack of geometry and the holes have been relegated
to obscurity at extreme corners of the image.
The holes have no connectivity with larger geometrically based circles. And the very significant “arc triangles” at
the center of loops have been replaced with “real triangles”. These are all things “appealing to the
artistic mind”.
In the image below, one can see the very different focus on geometry
and not artwork. The image below shows how a typical group of magnetic lines
interact with the two ovals using hole centers to define the green line and
azimuth. One can see in the spreadsheet highlighted in yellow that suggested
model values for the angles are inserted and when 82.0268978 (from Hindu calc
at left) and 23.75, the third angle is 74.22731 and that yields .2061869 in
column D.
How a communication works is that you insert numbers that are close
to what the ACAD numbers are, but are infinitely precise. Then something must happen in further
calculations to indicate that you have entered what the communication wanted,
or at least one their options. If one is
willing to accept lesser precision, there are probably more solutions. In my
work, I try to only accept five digits of precision and prefer six.
So below the .2061869 number in column D, 2.06181629xxxx is
developed from the neutron using Egyptian King Chamber procedure and the angle
calculated in C205. The other two angles
below it are calculated with formulae shown to their left. The green dashed line length is established as
a “suggested known” and the other two lengths are calculated using the angles
in the Law of Cosines. Once all three
sides are given, the sum is highlighted in yellow. Then as a final check, the ratio of each side
to the total, a dimensionless ratio, is used to find some type of indication
that the calculation was what was wanted to fit the model. In green are two separate numbers using
different ratios that both come up with 1.215668, the most abundant wavelength
of hydrogen. The spreadsheet formulae are given to the left.
Along those lines of logic, the
image below attempts to find if the most easily defined loop has a relationship
with the hole right above it. The axis
of all the loops point directly at the center of the hole marked in dashed
cyan. Then only two ACAD lengths, center to center distance .61999847 and the largest
loop dimensionless ratio of major to minor radius also in cyan at
1.057133722. One can see then the
mathematical analysis of plain ratios, conjugate ratios and combinations of
ratios and conjugate ratios lead to some pretty precise numbers that bear the
mark of a design. Obviously, with two variables and multiple equations these
can be solved precisely but the original data was left to show how precise ACAD
can be used in this scenario.
Spell checker mode
In a spell checker like say MS Word, as soon as you start typing a
word, it starts checking to see if it recognizes the word in its “dictionary”.
It has gone there, looked at the alternatives, saved them to a temporary
array….smoked a few cigars and drank a few beers….before you finish typing the
next letter. By the time you type a space to indicate you are going onto the
next word, it knows whether it recognizes the word or not and underlines it if
it didn’t find it. When you click on the
underline, it presents all the hits on the dictionary and presents them as
options for you to choose. If you type three letters of a four-letter word and
it didn’t find any word in its dictionary that can possibly fit, it begins to
annunciate. Of course, these days it gives up the cigars and beer and checks
for grammatical errors or repeated letters that are often first indication of a
typing error.
In the Newgrange Procedure, there are options along the way which
can lead you to some type of “check-point” they want you to find and complete
the communication. If you have a 2.06xxx number, first option is to divide by
1.2 to see what the “A-like” number looks like unless you already got the
2.06xxx number by dividing by 1.2.
Assuming it didn’t catch your attention, you now take the square root of
2.06xxx number and get a 1.436xxx number.
One then multiplies by 144 and see if you get a 206.7xxxx number. If not, go back to the 1.436xxx number and
take the square root to get a 1.19xxx number for which you now divide by 4 and
multiply by 50 to get a 14.9xxxx number which you will take the fifth root to
get an A-like number. There are a few variances of this simple example, but
this covers a lot of it.
((((2*C184)*1.2/100)^(1/4)/4*50)^(1/5)*1.2)^(1/2)*144
In the above example, 2 * C184 in green gives a 1.7xxx number which
you would multiply by 1.2 and shift the decimal back to the first digit
yielding a 2.06xxx number which you then take the fourth root…divide by 4…and
multiply by 50 and take the fifth root as shown in blue highlight. In the last
purple section, you multiply by 1.2 and only take the first square root and
multiply by 144 to get 206.7832 which is six digits of the magnetic flux
quantum.
If you have done this a few thousand times like I have, one begins
to be able to recognize far ahead of time where it will go and shorten the time
it takes you to get there.
In the image below one will see where the example came from for the
above explanation. This chart is of the
minor and major radii of the loop ellipses fit to the K52 image discussed above
in the triangle section. One can see this geometric analysis is far from
artistic in nature.
The row highlighted in blue letters is the simple ratio of major to
minor. The first red row highlighting is
the conjugate ratio of the radii. Underlined in purple, one can see that the
simple ratios yield near the square root of six for the small loop and the
conjugate ratios yield the square of six for the largest loop. This should get
one’s attention to look further.
The sum of the conjugate ratios uses the log function and Newgrange
Procedure to arrive at 1.718750024, a number used extensively at Newgrange and
covered many times earlier in this blog. The chart is clearly an exponential
equation and comes from the row in red letters and highlighted in light
blue. It is a mixture of ratios and
conjugate ratios….all dimensionless.
What might the K52 stone engraving be trying to say to us? By
referencing the magnetic flux quantum, it certainly is saying “something
magnetic”. By the holes, it could be pointing to magnetic portals recently
being researched. In just what is covered here, there is an encyclopedia of
information, much of which we may not already know.
Update 3-25-2023
The image below shows how a modern day drawn image of
magnetic domain appears similar to the multitude of diamond shaped images on
K52, shown to the right. The top angle on the drawn image is 72 degrees and on
the K52 is 71.735xxxx. The repeating diamonds on K52 might be referencing the
“close repeating of reconnections”. There doesn’t seem to be any artistic
reason for the repeating pattern.
The marked-up image below partially provided earlier, shows
two major lines in dashed yellow. The upper line shows quite precisely a
connection to the 5 diamonds on the left. Then going from left to right it
“kisses three magnetic loops” as is thought necessary to initiate a magnetic
portal. It finally terminates on the upper right at a “arc triangle” between
two ovals. For that many connections to be made, it had to be planned.
The line lengths are typed in yellow and tilted parallel to the lines. The upper being
12.5251514 and the lower 9.2718032 as measured originally by ACAD.
Originally, the target was to make the ratio the modern
magnetic flux quantum, 206.7833848. After the conjugate ratio was found to
signal the use of 2.030736xxxx used in the basic charge connection with phi,
that was set as the target and the magnetic flux quantum number resulting moved
up to 206.7838452, still quite close.
In Column D, the new value for the lower yellow line
(9.271707799) was found to develop a very precise 1.215667847 hydrogen most
abundant wavelength. This indicates that the choice for the ratio was probably
intended.
In the
image below a more extensive range of dimensionless ratios is analyzed and in
particular the portion within the diamond area which seems to reflect on
magnetic portals or maybe portals in general. From the ACAD drawing of K52
yellow dashed line second image above, the measurements are from the upper
right end back left to the next red hexagon marker sequentially until the final
point on the left lower end. While the overall sums reflect some interesting
numbers on the far bottom right corner, it is the area highlighted in red text
that seems to point to the magnetic flux quantum shown at the bottom of Column
I in red text 206.782 calculated first using the Newgrange Procedure and second
with a double exponential function. The Excel formulae are given to the left of
the text. At the bottom right in green box is the common solution to both
calculations at 206.78267xxx which is fairly close to recent values.
The graphs
show some interesting mathematical functions that are extremely unlikely to be
accidental. This seems to indicate portals may be related to each other and may
occur in groups of five or six.
The image below from the video Hidden Magnetic Portals Around Earth demonstrates an artistic rendition of potential magnetic portals. Probably only the drafter knew where the radii came from, but they came from some data because the spreadsheet of dimensionless ratios indicates there was some basic mathematical geometry. The sum of all 25 dimensionless ratios easily converts to 2.06175xxxx and that is extremely close to the Jakob Steiner X^1/x solution 2.061755296xxx for 1.42040575188923, the hydrogen hyperfine model number. There are numerous other ratios that appear to descend from some type of exponential equations. If magnetic portals have geometric order, then what is shown on K52 might be of benefit in greater understanding and perhaps aid in finding them more definitively.
On the image below, there is a place on the K52 stone that
looks just like the central part of this image between the two ovals, turned 90
degrees.
Below is an image from a loop from the sun’s dark spots showing what appears to be magnetic loops obviously thousands of miles in height and width. The wiry look is very specific.
Jim Branson, Retired Professional Engineering Manager, bransonjim9 at gmail dot com.
Appendix Mathematics Modeling 101
Sometimes in the manufacturing industry after years of
trying piece-meal solutions there comes a time when it is decided that an
“overall approach” is needed. Generally, this involves perhaps even hundreds of
variables, some of which are “operator-error” or maybe “maintenance-man
mistakes”, otherwise known as “human-error”. There are times when we have to
consider what humans might do under special circumstances.
Two things are certain about Newgrange and structures like it;
1) a lot of thought went into the design; 2) we will need to offer-up a lot of
thought to figure out what they were trying to communicate.
The effort of this blog, and a dozen or so like it, is aimed
at discovering what the design intent was and how one might enlighten folks
with mathematical modeling. The efforts have routinely started with simple
observations and non-technical relationships and then moved into more complex
technical aspects.
In the case of Newgrange, the curiosity capturing aspect is
the use of phi (sqrt 5 + 1)/2 = 1.618033989 which the animal kingdom uses
routinely in skin and shell patterns. There are websites devoted to the wide
range of observations which are viewed as curious, but not really studied
scientifically to my knowledge. The reason may be in part be due to the minimal
exposure of the researchers to serious mathematics. According to the vast
number of curricula I have examined in hiring engineers for 40 years,
archeologists and bio-chemistry folks do not have a vivid curiosity towards
software and the mathematics behind it.
One of the Newgrange curiosity captures is that phi squared
is equal to phi + 1 and 1/phi is equal to phi -1. Presented at Newgrange is
another not so familiar event using phi cubed equals phi squared plus 2.
Perhaps we should write a program and capture some time on a mainframe computer
and figure this out. 😊
Or, perhaps we should just think about it a bit, though this approach has not
been widely reported in modern textbooks.
It
happens, quite simply, that the square root of ten is equal to the square root
of 5 times the square root of 2. That is
simple enough. So, when relationships use the square of the product of the
square root of 5 and the square root of 2, one ends up with even numbers. Let’s
use some eight-grade math.
[(5^(1/2) + 1] /2 squared
is 5/4 + [5^(1/2) * 2 ]/4 + ¼ = 2.618033989 or
1 + phi = 2.618033989
Obviously,
when we square the square root it becomes the whole number. Therefore, any time
we square a square root, we end up with a hole number. Likewise, when we cube a square root, we end
up with the square root again.
This
repetitiveness is what makes it work for the animal world so they can precisely
repeat a pattern quite efficiently. So…..how did the animal world figure this
out??? I leave that up to the reader.
But in the modeling world, it provides us a simple way to sort of “catch our
breath” and get mathematics working for the communication.
The
Wakeman Data Model uses the overall passage length (89 feet) and the cross-cut
length (21 feet) in a conjugate dimensionless ratio to find “near phi”. It uses
the overall length of phi cubed times the width (21) to be very near 89 feet.
What
level of mathematics does this involve? It is not nearly at the level of the
Plimpton 322 Sumerian Tablet, but the complexity is really the use of phi in
such an inter-related arrangement and still easily discovered by someone
looking for that type of communication. Just consider how many readers could
put something like this together? Maybe a high school math teacher intrigued by
a puzzle-world? Or maybe somebody like a savant who has no idea why anyone
would like to know the details? Or much more likely, someone who wants to cause
somebody in the distant future to pay attention to the Newgrange construction.
After
seeing this mentality in dozens of structures around the world, it becomes
routine to expect to see it in structures that are far too complex and labor
consuming to be some temple or tomb.
Speaking
of “high-tech communications”, consider the formula below:
[ 450,000 / ln(E-1)]^(1/2)
= 911.7531512 (the Rydberg No. for Hydrogen Lyman)
Not
only is the Lyman Series of hydrogen wavelengths the most abundant hydrogen
spectrum, but all other isotopes and elements are related to this number. There is no “general purpose” Rydberg number
that “fits all” as has been pursued for decades.
One
would probably need to have taken high school physics or chemistry to have any
idea what the spectrum is all about, but most everybody knows about rainbows
and the gold buried at the ends.
The
term (E-1) = 1.71828 is one of many measures of Egyptian cubits. When the Book
of Genesis exposes the communication between God and Noah, the Ark is supposed
to be 300 cubits long x 50 cubits wide x 30 cubits high. Funny thing, the
product of those numbers is 450,000 and the cubit is 1.71828 feet or 20.619
inches, or about the length from my right arm middle finger back to the center
of the ball on my elbow. Most readers will probably have about the same length.
It was just an easy way to remember it.
While
reading this area in Genesis, one might note that Adam and almost all his male
offspring lived for over 900 years. Could it be that there are aliens who look
just like us that live that long? The
reader can decide what to make of it all.
I am certain almost everyone will have a different opinion.
If
I were designing the universe, I would make it self-deciphering. All the scientific data would relate to some
mathematical constant, like 1.71828, and valuable scientific discoveries would
relate to each other thru this number currently embedded in natural logarithm
base 2.71828 and some very famous physicist, like Dr. Feynman, would make a
comment on that fact. 😊
There
likely will be those readers who feel that “if you multiply and divide by
enough combination of numbers; take roots of all kinds; and do other
mathematical operations, you can come up with any sequence. But that is not how these procedures work.
1. 1.71875 x 1.2 = 2.0625 Any 2.06xxxx number is part of the procedure
2. 2.0625^(1/4) / 4 x 50 = 14.9798858 and
any 14.9xxxx number to the 1/5 root gives a 1.718xxxx type number
3. There are platform numbers developed
from A=1.718281828459xxxx such as a Planck / pi type [((120/A^(2))^2
/2]^(1/9) = 2.1091433636xxxxx of unlimited precision. Also (89669 x .0000225)^(1/2) =
1.42040575188923xxxxx
4. Other
precise numbers such as one solution to X^(1/X) = 1.42040575xxxx is
2.061755296xxxxx
5. A
number near the measured muon-electron magnetic moment ratio is 2.061755296^(1/2)
* 144 = 206.766916xxxx
6. An
A number like 1.71853405^(5) / 5 = 2.99792458
7. There
are a few other discoveries, but a lot more to find.
In
mathematical modeling, one must find variables that appear to be related to
each other by the data available, in this case multiple uses of phi. Normally,
one picks far more data that can be studied but each is run thru a number
crunching computer program that calculates a statistical relation such as the
correlation coefficient. The ones with the highest correlation are marked for
further study.
In
one study run for Kaiser Aluminum Mead Works in the mid-1970s, a very high
coefficient was found for the weather conditions, particularly the relative
humidity. But not for the current day,
but for many days earlier. To make a long story short, it was found the dust
collected from material transfer of ore (Al2O3) was
really relatively wet but it took several days for that wetter dust to reach
the electrolytic cells where it caused plug-ups in the feed rate.
The
communication at Newgrange is a different breed from the model above. Here the
objective is to broaden one’s perspective and look for “mathematical and
scientific words” that can cause one to think “outside the box”. The two
scientific terms in the Wakeman Data Model are the earth-sun distance, thought
to be a random number and it is not; and the Gaussian Gravitation Constant also
thought to be random and it is not. In the case of the earth-sun distance, the
ancient Egyptians provided the clue with the Royal Cubit and, in this case, the
ancient Newgrange folks provide the other clue.
Using
the hints from the first two relationships involving phi, one then tries other
relations such as the double-conjugate-ratio used with the earth-sun distance. The
original Wakeman Data indicates a number 1.49588 which is off only in the sixth
digit, a remarkably precise fit. Note
the “compound conjugate form” is one of twenty similar combinations of dimensionless
ratios that could be investigated, and they have not been. If you find three
volumes of the Encyclopedia Britannica, how long should it take to figure out
there should be more somewhere? What is the underlying message pulling the
“overall west chamber length of 7.75+ 6.00 feet” to the “passage to chamber
distance 6.5 feet”? Is something really important happening there? Indeed there
is to be shown later.
Similarly,
the Gaussian Constant is 1.72023 instead of 1.72021, again a very precise fit.
With fits to six digits, it seems almost certain that something will be found
as precise as it was. Do you think it is
strange to use a formula X^(1/Y)? Note that the planet Mars is quite
precisely pi^(1/E) =1.523671 the ratio to earth’s similar data.
This
initial model is a wakeup alert to seek as much of the intended communication
as possible. There will be those that say it is all a made-up accident, but
data hitting twice to six digits would be pretty hard to make happen. It is not
likely that somebody even with my technical skills could come up with a similar
model using other parameters. It now
seems likely that Newgrange has a lot to say about conditions here on earth.
And that will be proven repeatedly in the balance of this document.
Comments
Post a Comment